The day in 2013 when Leon Panetta, the Secretary of Defense, and General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed the order to open combat arms positions to women, Stacy Jones and her associates celebrated. After years of protesting for women’s rights, sometimes in very hostile environments, Stacy would finally get to see her dreams of equality revealed in their full glory. She had certainly fought for this right. It was something she believed in to the very marrow of her soul.
Just over four years later, war spread like wildfire throughout various parts of the world, threatening an ever-growing number of America’s financial interests. As a result, Congress passed legislation authorizing a draft, and Barack Obama’s successor signed this legislation into law. Until now, Stacy hadn’t really stopped to think that equality in the military work force also meant equality in the military draft force. After Mr. Jones was declared unfit for war due to his flat feet, Mrs. Jones and her comrades in women’s rights were now comrades in war.
In the blink of an eye, the United States Army packed Stacy up and shipped her off to Basic Training, where the drill sergeants bullied and disrespected everyone. As a well-educated, somewhat delicate, and elegantly fashionable Echo Boomer, Stacy found the drill sergeants’ behavior appalling. She took great offense to remarks like, “Button your top button! You’re a soldier, not a hooker!” and “Crawl through that mud before I drag you through it, Private. Now! Crawl through that mud, you little turd!” This was much worse than getting arrested at a protest.
Being away from her children was something Private Jones hadn’t planned on, either. How dare the military tear her away from her precious babies and leave them in the care of her flat-footed husband. Being yelled at, pushed physically to her limits, and separated from her family didn’t make her stronger or more willing to kill the enemy. To the contrary, Jones increasingly missed her old way of life – her family, her Human Resources job, and her kitchen, where the worst thing that could happen was a burnt turkey. She started to miss other things, too, like being allowed to cry and laugh mostly as she saw fit, as well as being called by her first name. In the past, to escape stressful situations, Stacy would simply turn on the waterworks, but here, this wasn’t an option. The more upset she became, the more ruthlessly the drill sergeants treated her.
Due to America’s intensifying militarization, Private Jones was rushed into combat. After 6 months of mediocre training, she was sent overseas and stationed in a muddy and bleak forward base of operations far from any semblance of civilized society, and she went to war. Although she had considered herself brave and immovable in her battle for women’s equality, she had become equally whiny and bitter when addressing draft equality. To be taken away from her children against her will just didn’t sit well with her. Terrified and pissed off, she finally decided that such bloody work so far from home should have been a man’s burden, not hers. She began to see the world through the lens of her own misery instead of through the more theoretical perception of the broader cultural injustices that used to bother her so much.
Stacy also hated the disturbing male-to-female ratio. Damn her flat-footed husband! Apparently, most other husbands were fit for war because men here outnumbered women 10 to 1. Where were all the other women who had fought so hard for their right to fight in combat units, she wondered. And as if all the other crap the Army had put her through wasn’t enough, now she was stuck in a foreign country with no running water. Within two months, Jones got her first vaginal infection due to a lack of proper hygienic standards. During one sleepless night, she realized that her irritated, itchy crotch made her more emotionally violent than anything the Army had done in its attempt to turn her into a trained killer.
Despite everyone’s need for intense bonding and free expression in an environment like this, Jones was often bothered by the men’s crude, distasteful, and sexist jokes. She had finally come to terms with the fact that men usually spoke differently when with other guys, but this forced mixed company made boundaries of appropriateness disappear immediately. Although the men in her unit were not behaving any differently than they would have had women not been present, because women were around male soldiers who were saying and doing all sorts of profane things, Stacy wondered if their behavior might be considered a form of sexual harassment. Of course, the men wondered the same thing, which created an uncomfortable gender barrier in the unit. Stacy could see everyone’s morale deteriorate over time, and she thought this was a very sad but inevitable reality.
Stacy noticed another problem that could threaten more than just morale. She knew that a few women could easily run a marathon or carry 100 pounds worth of gear over a great distance, but she wasn’t one of them. In fact, none of the women in her unit were one of them. As everyone found out the hard way, the majority of women couldn’t match the necessary standards that men could handle. This meant, of course, that quite a few of the male soldiers quickly grew resentful over the extra load they had to take on due to their female counterparts’ inability to carry their fair share of the load. Everyone could sense a dangerous tension building between the men and women within the unit. Stacy worried that the more agitated certain male soldiers got, the less safe she would be on the front lines of a firefight.
Nevertheless, with so many lonely soldiers separated from their families or significant others, several intimate relationships did form. Stacy started spending time with Fred Smith, both on and off the cot. Fred was actually a pretty nice guy, and Stacy figured a little male companionship would be good for a while. Some female soldiers had intentionally gotten pregnant in order to go home, but this wasn’t Stacy’s intention. She was just scared, lonely, sad, and in need of some kindness and attention. Moreover, Fred was convinced that he really loved Stacy.
Six months into her tour of duty, Stacy was shot during an ambush. Luckily, her flack vest absorbed the impact of the round, and she just suffered a cracked rib and some bruising from a hard fall, but Fred didn’t know this. He momentarily dropped his guard and sprinted across an open area toward Stacy. An enemy round ripped through his skull, and he was dead before he hit the ground.
Once back in country, Stacy returned to her life of being a mother and Human Resources worker, but only for a little while. She was now a mere shadow of the vibrant girl who once wanted to conquer the chauvinistic society that had held women back for so long. Her husband finally left her due to her depression, violent mood swings, and admission of her affair with Fred. He also took the children with him, per court order. Eventually, Stacy quit her job and just disappeared. Not even her closest friends and family members ever figured out where she went or what happened to her.

I’m not sure how I feel about this piece. As a veteran, I served with more than a few women. I faced combat in Grenada under Reagan in November of 1983. Although I admit that I’ve never served in Iraq or Afghanistan, this essay seems to lack verisimilitude. It just feels off.
Tim, do you think several of the circumstances Christy describes could happen in a mixed-gender combat unit? I bet they would.
This article brings up a valid point. Women entering male-dominated industries experience many of the same problems that Christy mentions, so I think these experiences are par for the course. No matter how the dice fall, war is nasty, ugly, and causes lasting psychological damage.
However, war is changing in this technological age, and so the face of the military must also change to stay current and competitive. After all, our country’s safety hinges on the strength of the military. Perhaps the government should create an elite Special Forces fem squad and send it to decapitate our enemies. We could call them the Amazons, and they could use their feminine wiles to lure our enemies into false security before pouncing and ruthlessly crushing them. That would be interesting, and it would eliminate the need for co-gender combat situations.
Generally, women are able to withstand more g-forces and more pain than men, so they would make the perfect forces for specific situations. As long as the women have the support of a dedicated in-group, I believe that they should be used in combat situations where their talents, skills, and natural biology can work to best advantage.
Feminine wiles? I think you mean ability to multi-task while killing terrorists and coordinating strikes.
The article is anti-woman sexist nonsense written by a self-loathing woman who’s pen trades in objectifying women. Poor thing has bought into a Victorian idea that men = strong and women = weak. I hope the author’s shining knight comes soon to rescue this poor damsel from the fire breathing dragon before she chips another nail.
All feedback is appreciated. Negative feedback is even more so. ( it’s a great way to broaden my personal knowledge and understanding.) I do not see one sex as being stronger than the other, but instead I believe that the sexes are different. Seeing how strongly you feel on this matter, I would love to know more on why you feel this way.
(Please exclude any further attacks on my personal character.)
I’m not a fan of war, so I’d send only women into war if I had my druthers.
Whoever wrote the piece above was not making a case for “different,” but rather asserting that women are mentally, physically and emotionally incapable of the same activities that men perform during war. It ignores that women have fought in combat the world over since the beginning of time, and continue to do so in many nations. The essentialist belief schema employed carries no intellectual weight anymore. It went out of style with the racist justifications for slavery. In any case, men and women are different only in reproductive roles.
It’s hard to avoid what you might characterize as a “personal attack” when the entire piece is so dependent on personal projection from a female that sees herself as “less than.” Maybe it wasn’t your intent to confess, but the feelings had to come from somewhere, no? If it’s not your personal feelings coming out in the piece, then “personal attack” is not possible. It’s hardly objective fact-based writing, it’s not scientific – just very emotional and speculative stuff.
(And very well written at that.)
I think you might be reading more into this than what’s there. This isn’t a broad analysis of women’s roles in combat; otherwise, it would be presented as such. This is a specific description of a particular, hypothetical experience, one that seems very plausible to me. Moreover, the premise is predicated on the implementation of a draft. If anything, this piece is anti-draft, not anti-woman. Or do you believe that anybody, male or female, could be picked up and dropped into a war-zone with no problems whatsoever?